3.4.4 Physical characteristics and technical requirements

Related discussions

Jenny Bunn Discussion started by Jenny Bunn 2 years ago

ISAD(G) says:

Purpose – To provide information about any important physical characteristics or technical requirements that affect use of the unit of description.

Rule – Indicate any physical conditions, such as preservation requirements that affect the use of the unit of description. Note any software and/or hardware required to access the unit of description.

We say:

For born digital material the information required to fulfil the purpose of this element is both extensive and complex. It may also be necessary to continually revisit this field as the impact of technical requirements on access may change over time. Practice is still emerging but it is suggested that there may need to be different views of the information recorded under this heading for different purposes. For example, it may need to be explained in summary in human terms and then also recorded in machine readable terms.

The human readable summary should explain physical characteristics and technical requirements in the context of access, e.g. if there is an access copy and a preservation copy of a digital object it may be necessary to explain that what will be accessed is a version of the object that has been prepared for access purposes (with perhaps implications for reduced functionality). Where appropriate, details should be given of whether and how users can access the preservation copy if they require the lost functionality.

The machine readable and more detailed version of the information may be automatically generated (either by the archive service’s, or earlier custodians’ systems) and held in separate digital repository systems, to which the catalogue may or may not link. It is envisaged that such information may be recorded using PREMIS http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/index.html.

Marc Fresko
Marc Fresko ARA should steer clear of most of this argument. It is far too large and complex, and covers much (much!) more than is even hinted at in the ISAD(G)... Show more 1 year ago
Rachel Agreed that this is extremely complex but for all that needs to be considered. I wonder whether it will end up being so vague as to not be of much... Show more 1 year ago
You need to be a member of this group before you can participate in this discussion.